Sex In Court
Sex In Court is a British factual entertainment series which premiered on E4 on March 29, 2007.
It takes a look at bedroom politics within modern relationships. The pilot features mother of two Rachel, who brings her husband Guy to court over a clash of lovemaking styles. Each episode sees people put on trial by their partner, or ex-partner. In a formal, court-like atmosphere, each party will be thoroughly cross-examined by a judge. Due to its nature E4 will air this programme after the watershed. The theme of the programme is very similar to Playboy TV's Sex Court.
Episode guide
Episode 1–29 March 2007
- Rachel v Guy - Guy is obsessed with anal sex. - Guilty
- Sentence: Anal sex banned for a month and lubricant must be used.
- Joanna v Ashley - Ashley has been secretly filming himself and Joanna having sex and showing this video to his mates.. - Guilty
- Sentence: Deletion of video and Ashley must ask for consent if he wishes to do it again.
Episode 2–5 April 2007
- Whinnie v Themba - Whinnie is accused of unfair denial of cunnilingus. - Not Guilty
- Sentence: Themba must never pressure Whinnie into performing cunnilingus, and Whinnie was given some aids to help her explore her own body.
- Marco v Anna - Marco watches porn while having sex with Anna and he refuses to let her watch too.. - Guilty
- Sentence: Banning of pornography while having sex until Anna is ready to reintroduce it, and she must take part.
Episode 3–12 April 2007
- Ilian v Louisa - Unfair refusal to reciprocate oral sex. - Guilty
- Sentence: Louisa is sent on fellatio course.
- Lauren v Ian - Ian makes non-stop demands for early morning sex. - Guilty
- Sentence: Ban on morning sex and Ian most not wake Lauren if he decides to wake up to stop himself from wanting sex.
Episode 4–19 April 2007
- Lee v Keeley - Unreasonable refusal to dress up for sex. - Guilty
- Sentence: She must make Lee's fantasy come true.
- Nathan v Emmy - Unreasonable refusal to allow semen on body and face. - Not Guilty
- Sentence: Nathan must abide by Emmy's rules.
Episode 5–26 April 2007
- Liddy v Bobby - Rebuffal of sexual advances. - Not Guilty
- Sentence: They are rewarded with a night at a hotel, away from Bobby's parents house.
- Laura v Chris - Excessive demands for sex. - Not Guilty
- Sentence: They must come to some sort of compromise.
Episode 6–3 May 2007
- Jenny v Matt - Unfair refusal to indulge in sexual fantasy. - Not Guilty
- Greg v Lucy - Inconsiderate possession and use of vibrator. - Not Guilty
Episode 7–10 May 2007
- Joanne v Nick - Treating sex as a joke. - Guilty
- Sentence: Jokes must be stopped and Nick sent on a sex course so he can satisfy Joanne for longer.
- Dawn v Dave - Unfair withholding of dominant bedroom behaviour. - Not Guilty